A visitor’s guide to Legis-Intel Pakistan.

Your first research journey

1. Find an instrument. Open Explore legislation and enter distinctive title words, such as Health Care Commission. Refine by source collection, year in title, instrument type or record content. The library searches titles, not the full text of every law.
2. Open and search the text. Choose a reader result. Use Search this legislation for a provision number, heading or words within that document. Click a result to jump to its passage. Reading positions and draft headings are navigation aids; verify numbering against the source.
3. Inspect Source and version. Check the recorded source, edition, text quality and content extent. Open the recorded official source where available. A source notice is not legislation text; a source-collection label does not establish applicability.
4. Follow the relationship. Open Qanun Maps to compare selected authority and judicial relationships. In the evidence inspector, read both supporting passages and their edition notes. Use Rule workbench to inspect research propositions, supporting evidence and missing facts.
5. Explore Judicial Intelligence. Search Judicial Intelligence for a judgment lead. Expand reviewed relationships where available and follow the linked provision. Discovery records and reviewed passages carry different evidential weight; read the review limits.
6. Retain your references. Bookmark the passage URL and record the title, source edition, passage, access date and review limits. A reader’s Download text and Structured record links provide held TXT and JSON records. Review permitted use before redistribution.

Try it: Rules of Business and Mustafa Impex

Start with the Rule 16 worked mapping. Inspect the judgment passage beside the held Rules of Business provision, then follow the reader link to see the surrounding text. The judgment’s historical context and the separately held legislative edition must remain distinct.

Next, open Rule workbench and search for Rule 16. Examine the returned propositions and evidence gaps. The workbench organises your research; it does not decide whether a particular decision is lawful.

Use Legis-Intel Pakistan with a compatible AI client

The MCP connector lets a compatible client retrieve held records and mapped evidence during a conversation. Start by reading the supported pilot options and setup instructions on AI connections. Pilot access uses an operator-issued key; self-service ChatGPT browser connection and paid activation remain in development.

Try: “Find the Rules of Business and retrieve the supporting passages for its Mustafa Impex Rule 16 mapping. Show the source editions and what remains unchecked.” Follow the returned links and assess the AI’s explanation against the sources.

Planned membership is US$5 monthly or US$50 annually, with institutional licensing by quotation. Payments remain coming soon. See membership and permitted use before arranging access; do not put a private access key into a public prompt.

Before relying on a result

• Is this a held law text, a source notice, a discovery lead or a reviewed passage?
• Does the edition match the date and jurisdiction relevant to your question?
• Have you checked commencement, amendments, repeal, savings and subsequent judicial treatment where relevant?
• Does the cited passage support the exact proposition, including exceptions and surrounding context?
• Which facts or sources are missing? Keep them unresolved until supported.

These tools support research and human judgment. They do not supply a binding legal determination or establish current force merely by returning a result. See the glossary for the labels used throughout the site.

If you cannot find what you need

• No title result: try fewer words, alternative spelling or clear filters. Search within a reader only after opening the relevant instrument.
• No mapped judgment: the collection may have no reviewed relationship for that provision. This is a coverage gap, not proof that courts have never considered it.
• A source link fails: retain the record identifier and held-version details. Check the source publisher directly; do not silently substitute a different edition.
• The AI gives an unsupported answer: ask for the actual tool result and passage links. Treat a confident explanation without supporting evidence as unverified.

To understand the programme behind the tools, read the six Law as Code concepts and Legislative Intelligence.