RESTRICTION OF HABITUAL OFFENDERS (PUNJAB) ACT, 1918
Stored extracted text; legal completeness and current force have not been independently established. Inspect source and version details
Reading view reduces excess blank space and hides page extraction markers. Original text and downloads are retained.
Reading layout follows the stored source. Open the original transcription below to compare wording and extraction details.
Restriction of Habitual Offenders (Punjab) 1918: Act V
TEXT 1THE RESTRICTION OF HABITUAL OFFENDERS (PUNJAB) ACT 1918 2(V of 1918) [26 April 1918] An Act for restricting the movements of habitual offenders in the Punjab and for requiring them to report themselves. WHEREAS it is expedient to make provision for restricting the movements of habitual offenders in the Punjab and requiring habitual offenders in the Punjab to report themselves, and whereas the previous sanction of the Governor-General in Council has been obtained under section 79(2) of the Government of India Act, 1915, to the passing of this Act: it is hereby enacted as follows:–
Section 1. Title and extent
(a) This Act may be called the Restriction of Habitual Offenders (Punjab) Act, 1918.
(b) It extends to the Punjab.
Section 2. Scope of order of restriction
An “Order of restriction” passed under this Act may restrict a person in his movements to any area prescribed in the order; or it may require a person to report himself at times and places and in the mode prescribed in the order; or it may do both.
Section 3. Order of restriction against habitual offenders
(a) In any case in which a Magistrate may under the provisions of section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 3, as it is at present enacted or as it may from time to time be amended, require a person to show cause why he should not be ordered to execute a bond for his good behaviour, the Magistrate may in lieu of or in addition to so doing require such person to show cause why an order of restriction should not be made against him.
(b) Joint proceedings and record.– If the Magistrate in addition to requiring such person to show cause why he should not be ordered to execute a bond for his good behaviour requires him to show cause why an order of restriction should not be made against him, the proceedings in respect of the order of restriction may be taken jointly with the proceedings in respect of security and may be entered in and form part of the same record.
1For Statement of Objects and Reasons, see Punjab Gazette, Part V, dated January 18, 1918, pp. 53-55; for Report of the Select Committee, see ibid., dated February 8, 1918, pp. 59-63; for proceedings in Council, see ibid., dated January 4, 1918 dated January 4, 1918, pp. 15-21, dated February 22, 1918, pp. 109-130, and 132-150.
2This Act received the assent of the Lieutenant-Governor of the Punjab on 14th March, 1918; that of the Governor-General on 2nd April, 1918; and, was published in the Punjab Gazette Part V, dated 26th April, 1918, pp. 340-342. 3India Act V of 1898.
Section 4. Procedure in making order of restriction
When a Magistrate deems it necessary to require a person to show cause why an order of restriction should not be made against him, he shall follow as nearly as may be the procedure laid down in sections 112, 113, 114, 115 and 117 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 1:
Provided that–
(1) the order in writing referred to in section 112 of the said Code shall in addition to setting forth the substance of the information received state the term not exceeding three years during which the order of restriction shall be in force; but it need not state whether the order of restriction shall be an order restricting the person to any area or requiring him to report himself or doing both; and
(2) for the purposes of section 117(2) of the said Code an order of restriction shall be deemed to be equivalent to an order requiring security for good behaviour.
Section 5. Issue of warrant in lieu of or in addition to summons. Section 90 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
The provisions of section 90 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 2, shall be applicable to proceedings under this Act as if they were proceedings under the said Code.
Section 6. Discharge of person informed against
If upon enquiry made in accordance with the preceding sections the Magistrate is of opinion that no order of restriction is necessary, the Magistrate shall make an entry to that effect on the record, and if he does not order the execution of a bond for good behaviour he shall if such person is in custody only for purposes of the enquiry release him or if such person is not in custody discharge him.
Section 7. Making of order of restriction
If upon enquiry as aforesaid the Magistrate is of opinion that an order of restriction should be made against any person in respect of whom the enquiry is being made, the Magistrate shall make an order accordingly:
Provided that he shall not make an order of restriction against any person against whom he makes an order under section 118 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 3, requiring such person to execute a bond for his good behaviour.
Particulars to be specified in order of restriction.– In his order under this section the Magistrate shall state whether the said person shall be restricted in his movements, or shall be required to report himself, or both. The order shall conform to any rules made by the 4[Provincial Government] under section 16 and shall specify the area and the nature of the restrictions to be imposed and the places and the times and mode of report, as the case may be.
1India Act V of 1898. 2India Act V of 1898. 3India Act V of 1898.
4Substituted for the words “Local Government” by the Government of India (Adaptations of Indian Laws) Order, 1937, dated 18th March, 1937, published in the Gazette of India (Extraordinary), dated April 1, 1937, pp. 75-344, s. 4 and Table of General Adaptations.
No order of restriction shall be for a term exceeding three years or for a term longer than that specified in the order under section 4.
Section 8. Order of restriction under section 123(3) of Criminal Procedure Code
(1) An order passed by a Sessions Judge under section 123(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 1, may substitute for an order requiring security an order of restriction for the same or a less period.
(2) Order of restriction against convicted offender.– In any case in which a Court or Magistrate is empowered to take action against any convicted person under section 565 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 2, such Court or Magistrate may if it or he thinks fit at the time of passing sentence on such person and in lieu of passing an order under the said section make an order of restriction against such person for a period not exceeding three years from the date of the expiry of such sentence.
(3) If such conviction is set aside on appeal or otherwise, such order shall become void.
Section 9. Means of livelihood within area of restriction
(1) No order shall be made restricting any person to any area unless the Court or Magistrate making the order is satisfied that such person has adequate means of earning his livelihood within the area of restriction: Provided that before making such order the Court or Magistrate shall record and consider any objection which such person may urge in regard to the area proposed.
(2) Change of area where means of livelihood insufficient.– If at any time any person against whom an order of restriction has been passed under this Act satisfies the Court or Magistrate passing the order or the District Magistrate that he has no sufficient means of earning his livelihood within the area to which he is restricted the Court or Magistrate shall change the area.
Section 10. Power to cancel order of restriction
The District Magistrate may at any time for sufficient reasons to be recorded in writing cancel any order of restriction passed by any Court having jurisdiction in his district.
Section 11. Power to vary area of restriction
The District Magistrate may at any time change the area to which the movements of any person have been restricted by an order of restriction passed under this Act:
Provided that such person shall be given an opportunity of showing cause why such change should not be made.
Section 12. Power to substitute order of restriction for bond for good behaviour
When an order requiring security for good behaviour has been made against any person under section 118 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 3 by any Court whether before or after this Act comes into force, the District Magistrate may at any
1India Act V of 1898. 2India Act V of 1898. 3India Act V of 1898.
time before the period of security has expired substitute therefor an order of restriction:
Provided that–
(a) the period of the order of restriction shall not exceed the unexpired period of security; and
(b) no order of restriction shall be passed against any person under this section until he has been given an opportunity of showing cause why such order should not be passed.
Section 13. Appeal
Any person against whom an order of restriction has been passed by any Magistrate other than a District Magistrate may appeal to the District Magistrate to have the order set aside.
Section 14. Applicability of the Code of Criminal Procedure to appeals and revisions
The provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 1, shall be applicable to appeals and petitions of revision under this Act as if they were appeals and petitions of revision presented under the said Code.
Section 15. Arrest of person found beyond prescribed limits
(1) If any person against whom an order of restriction under this Act has been passed is found in any place beyond the area to which his movements have been restricted, without the pass prescribed by the rules made under this Act, or at a time or in a place not permitted by the conditions of his pass, he may be arrested without warrant by any police officer, zaildar, inamdar, village headman or village watchman.
(2) Any person, not being a police officer, making an arrest under this section shall without unnecessary delay make over the person so arrested to a police officer, or, in the absence of a police officer, take or send such person to the nearest police station.
Section 16. Power to make rules
The 2[Provincial Government] may make rules 3 to provide for and regulate–
(i) the areas to which persons may be restricted under this Act and the nature of the restrictions to be observed by them;
(ii) the times and places at which and the mode in which persons shall report themselves when required to do so under this Act;
(iii) the conditions as to holding passes under which persons may be permitted to leave the area to which their movements have been restricted;
(iv) the conditions to be inserted in any such pass in regard to–
(a) the places to which the holder of the pass may or may not go;
1India Act V of 1898.
2Substituted for the words “Local Government” by the Government of India (Adaptations of Indian Laws) Order, 1937, dated 18th March, 1937, published in the Gazette of India (Extraordinary), dated April 1, 1937, pp. 75-344, s. 4 and Table of General Adaptations.
3Issued vide Notification No. 9859, dated 29th April, 1918, published in the Gazette of India (Extraordinary), dated April 1, 1917,
pp. 115-119.
(b) the persons before whom from time to time he shall be bound to present himself, and
(c) the time during which he may be absent.
Section 17. Penalties
(1) Whoever being a person against whom an order of restriction under this Act has been passed violates such order or any rule made under this Act, shall on conviction by a Magistrate of the first class be punished–
(a) on a first conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both;
(b) on a second conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years;
(c) on any subsequent conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years.
(2) Period of imprisonment to be excluded from period of order of restriction.– In computing the period for which an order of restriction shall remain in force, any period of imprisonment undergone in execution of a sentence passed under sub-section (1) of this section shall be excluded.
Print contents from the source
CONTENTS 1. Title and extent. 2. Scope of order of restriction. 3. Order of restriction against habitual offenders. Joint proceedings and record. 4. Procedure in making order of restriction. 5. Issue of warrant in lieu of or in addition to summons. Section 90 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 6. Discharge of person informed against. 7. Making of order of restriction. Particulars to be specified in order of restriction. 8. Order of restriction under section 123(3) of Criminal Procedure Code. Order of restriction against convicted offender. 9. Means of livelihood within area of restriction. Change of area where means of livelihood insufficient. 10. Power to cancel order of restriction. 11. Power to vary area of restriction. 12. Power to substitute order of restriction for bond for good behavior. 13. Appeal. 14. Applicability of the Code of Criminal Procedure to appeals and revisions. 15. Arrest of person found beyond prescribed limits. 16. Power to make rules. 17. Penalties. Period of imprisonment to be excluded from period of order of restriction. THE RESTRICTION OF HABITUAL OFFENDERS (PUNJAB) ACT 1918 (V of 1918)
Compare the original stored transcription
Exact source transcription retained, including print layout and extraction artifacts. Text SHA-256: 91139212f9b9d135eb20594130ccdeaeb24d96fc24e9637455dc6586c324b417.
Restriction of Habitual Offenders (Punjab)
1918: Act V
CONTENTS
1. Title and extent.
2. Scope of order of restriction.
3. Order of restriction against habitual offenders.
Joint proceedings and record.
4. Procedure in making order of restriction.
5. Issue of warrant in lieu of or in addition to summons. Section 90 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure.
6. Discharge of person informed against.
7. Making of order of restriction.
Particulars to be specified in order of restriction.
8. Order of restriction under section 123(3) of Criminal Procedure Code.
Order of restriction against convicted offender.
9. Means of livelihood within area of restriction.
Change of area where means of livelihood insufficient.
10. Power to cancel order of restriction.
11. Power to vary area of restriction.
12. Power to substitute order of restriction for bond for good behavior.
13. Appeal.
14. Applicability of the Code of Criminal Procedure to appeals and revisions.
15. Arrest of person found beyond prescribed limits.
16. Power to make rules.
17. Penalties.
Period of imprisonment to be excluded from period of order of restriction.
THE RESTRICTION OF HABITUAL OFFENDERS
(PUNJAB) ACT 1918
(V of 1918)
TEXT
1
THE RESTRICTION OF HABITUAL OFFENDERS (PUNJAB) ACT
1918
2
(V of 1918)
[26 April 1918]
An
Act
for restricting the movements of habitual offenders in the Punjab and for requiring
them to report themselves.
WHEREAS it is expedient to make provision for restricting the movements of
habitual offenders in the Punjab and requiring habitual offenders in the Punjab to
report themselves, and whereas the previous sanction of the Governor -General in
Council has been obtained under section 79(2) of the Government of India Act,
1915, to the passing of this Act: it is hereby enacted as follows:–
1. Title and extent .– (a) This Act may be called the Restriction of Habitual
Offenders (Punjab) Act, 1918.
(b) It extends to the Punjab.
2. Scope of order of restriction .– An “Order of restriction” passed under this
Act may restrict a person in his movements to any area prescribed in the order; or it
may require a person to report himself at times and pla ces and in the mode
prescribed in the order; or it may do both.
3. Order of restriction against habitual offenders .– (a) In any case in which a
Magistrate may under the provisions of section 110 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1898
3
, as it is at prese nt enacted or as it may from time to time be
amended, require a person to show cause why he should not be ordered to execute
a bond for his good behaviour, the Magistrate may in lieu of or in addition to so doing
require such person to show cause why an or der of restriction should not be made
against him.
(b) Joint proceedings and record .– If the Magistrate in addition to
requiring such person to show cause why he should not be ordered to
execute a bond for his good behaviour requires him to show cause why
an order of restriction should not be made against him, the proceedings
in respect of the order of restriction may be taken jointly with the
proceedings in respect of security and may be entered in and form part
of the same record.
1For Statement of Objects and Reasons, see Punjab Gazette , Part V, dated January 18, 1918, pp. 53-55; for Report of the
Select Committee, see ibid., dated February 8, 1918, pp. 59-63; for proceedings in Council, see ibid., dated January 4, 1918
dated January 4, 1918, pp. 15-21, dated February 22, 1918, pp. 109-130, and 132-150.
2This Act received the assent of the Lieutenant -Governor of the Punjab on 14 th March, 1918; that of the Governor -General on
2nd April, 1918; and, was published in the Punjab Gazette Part V, dated 26th April, 1918, pp. 340-342.
3India Act V of 1898.
4. Procedure in making order of restriction .– When a Magistrate deems it
necessary to require a person to show cause why an order of restriction should not
be made against him, he shall follow as nearly as may be the procedure laid down in
sections 112, 113, 114, 115 and 117 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898
1
:
Provided that–
(1) the order in writing referred to in section 112 of the said Code shall in
addition to setting forth the substance of the information received state
the term not exceeding three years during which t he order of restriction
shall be in force; but it need not state whether the order of restriction
shall be an order restricting the person to any area or requiring him to
report himself or doing both; and
(2) for the purposes of section 117(2) of the said Code an order of
restriction shall be deemed to be equivalent to an order requiring
security for good behaviour.
5. Issue of warrant in lieu of or in addition to summons. Section 90 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure.– The provisions of section 90 of the C ode of Criminal
Procedure, 1898
2
, shall be applicable to proceedings under this Act as if they were
proceedings under the said Code.
6. Discharge of person informed against .– If upon enquiry made in
accordance with the preceding sections the Magistrate is of opinion that no order of
restriction is necessary, the Magistrate shall make an entry to that effect on the
record, and if he does not order the execution of a bond for good behaviour he shall
if such person is in custody only for purposes of the enqui ry release him or if such
person is not in custody discharge him.
7. Making of order of restriction .– If upon enquiry as aforesaid the Magistrate
is of opinion that an order of restriction should be made against any person in
respect of whom the enquiry i s being made, the Magistrate shall make an order
accordingly:
Provided that he shall not make an order of restriction against any person
against whom he makes an order under section 118 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1898
3
, requiring such person to execute a bond for his good behaviour.
Particulars to be specified in order of restriction .– In his order under this
section the Magistrate shall state whether the said person shall be restricted in his
movements, or shall be required to report himself, o r both. The order shall conform
to any rules made by the
4
[Provincial Government] under section 16 and shall specify
the area and the nature of the restrictions to be imposed and the places and the
times and mode of report, as the case may be.
1India Act V of 1898.
2India Act V of 1898.
3India Act V of 1898.
4Substituted for the words “Local Government” by the Government of India (Adaptations of Indian Laws) Order, 1937, dated 18th
March, 1937, published in the Gazette of India (Extraordinary) , dated April 1, 1937, pp. 75-344, s. 4 and Table of General
Adaptations.
No order of restriction shall be for a term exceeding three years or for a term
longer than that specified in the order under section 4.
8. Order of restriction under section 123(3) of Criminal Procedure Code .–
(1) An order passed by a Sessions Judge under section 1 23(3) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1898
1
, may substitute for an order requiring security an order of
restriction for the same or a less period.
(2) Order of restriction against convicted offender .– In any case in
which a Court or Magistrate is empow ered to take action against any convicted
person under section 565 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898
2
, such Court or
Magistrate may if it or he thinks fit at the time of passing sentence on such person
and in lieu of passing an order under the said s ection make an order of restriction
against such person for a period not exceeding three years from the date of the
expiry of such sentence.
(3) If such conviction is set aside on appeal or otherwise, such order shall
become void.
9. Means of livelihood within area of restriction.– (1) No order shall be made
restricting any person to any area unless the Court or Magistrate making the order is
satisfied that such person has adequate means of earning his livelihood within the
area of restriction: Provided th at before making such order the Court or Magistrate
shall record and consider any objection which such person may urge in regard to the
area proposed.
(2) Change of area where means of livelihood insufficient .– If at any
time any person against whom an order of restriction has been passed under this Act
satisfies the Court or Magistrate passing the order or the District Magistrate that he
has no sufficient means of earning his livelihood within the area to which he is
restricted the Court or Magistrate shall change the area.
10. Power to cancel order of restriction .– The District Magistrate may at any
time for sufficient reasons to be recorded in writing cancel any order of restriction
passed by any Court having jurisdiction in his district.
11. Power to vary area of restriction .– The District Magistrate may at any time
change the area to which the movements of any person have been restricted by an
order of restriction passed under this Act:
Provided that such person shall be given an opportunity of showi ng cause
why such change should not be made.
12. Power to substitute order of restriction for bond for good behaviour .–
When an order requiring security for good behaviour h as been made against any
person under section 118 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1898
3
by any Court
whether before or after this Act comes into force, the District Magistrate may at any
1India Act V of 1898.
2India Act V of 1898.
3India Act V of 1898.
time before the period of security has expired substitute therefor an order of
restriction:
Provided that–
(a) the period of the order of restricti on shall not exceed the unexpired
period of security; and
(b) no order of restriction shall be passed against any person under this
section until he has been given an opportunity of showing cause why
such order should not be passed.
13. Appeal.– Any person against whom an order of restriction has been passed
by any Magistrate other than a District Magistrate may appeal to the District
Magistrate to have the order set aside.
14. Applicability of the Code of Criminal Procedure to appeals and
revisions.– The provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898
1
, shall be
applicable to appeals and petitions of revision under this Act as if they were appeals
and petitions of revision presented under the said Code.
15. Arrest of person found beyond prescribed li mits.– (1) If any person
against whom an order of restriction under this Act has been passed is found in any
place beyond the area to which his movements have been restricted, without the
pass prescribed by the rules made under this Act, or at a time or in a place not
permitted by the conditions of his pass, he may be arrested without warrant by any
police officer, zaildar, inamdar, village headman or village watchman.
(2) Any person, not being a police officer, making an arrest under this
section shall wi thout unnecessary delay make over the person so arrested to a
police officer, or, in the absence of a police officer, take or send such person to the
nearest police station.
16. Power to make rules .– The
2
[Provincial Government] may make rules
3
to
provide for and regulate–
(i) the areas to which persons may be restricted under this Act and the
nature of the restrictions to be observed by them;
(ii) the times and places at which and the mode in which persons shall
report themselves when required to do so under this Act;
(iii) the conditions as to holding passes under which persons may be
permitted to leave the area to which their movements have been
restricted;
(iv) the conditions to be inserted in any such pass in regard to–
(a) the places to which the holder of the pass may or may not go;
1India Act V of 1898.
2Substituted for the words “Local Government” by the Government of India (Adaptations of Indian Laws) Order, 1937, dated 18th
March, 1937, published in the Gazette of India (Extraordinary) , dated April 1, 1937, pp. 75-344, s. 4 and Table of General
Adaptations.
3Issued vide Notification No. 9859, dated 29th April, 1918, published in the Gazette of India (Extraordinary), dated April 1, 1917,
pp. 115-119.
(b) the persons before whom from time to time he shall be bound to
present himself, and
(c) the time during which he may be absent.
17. Penalties.– (1) Whoever being a person against whom an order of restriction
under this Act has been passed violates such order or any rule made under this Act,
shall on conviction by a Magistrate of the first class be punished–
(a) on a first conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term
which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both;
(b) on a second conviction with imprisonment of either description for a
term which may extend to two years;
(c) on any subsequent conviction with imprisonment of either description
for a term which may extend to three years.
(2) Period of im prisonment to be excluded from period of order of
restriction.– In computing the period for which an order of restriction shall remain in
force, any period of imprisonment undergone in execution of a sentence passed
under sub-section (1) of this section shall be excluded.This law in the library
Follow the instruments and provisions named in this source edition, and the laws that cite it. Citation links identify the text being referred to; legal effect and current force require separate examination.
Instruments cited by this law 1
References to provisions in this text 3
Section 16
Open the identified operative provision
Read reference in context
be restricted in his movements, or shall be required to report himself, o r both. The order shall conform to any rules made by the 4 [Provincial Government] under section 16 and shall specify the area and the nature of the restrictions to be imposed and the places and the times and mode of report, as the case may be. 1India Act V of 1
Section 4
Open the identified operative provision
Read reference in context
4 and Table of General Adaptations. No order of restriction shall be for a term exceeding three years or for a term longer than that specified in the order under section 4. 8. Order of restriction under section 123(3) of Criminal Procedure Code .– (1) An order passed by a Sessions Judge under section 1 23(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 1 , may substitute for an order requiring
Section 1
Open the identified operative provision
Read reference in context
hat specified in the order under section 4. 8. Order of restriction under section 123(3) of Criminal Procedure Code .– (1) An order passed by a Sessions Judge under section 1 23(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 1 , may substitute for an order requiring security an order of restriction for the same or a less period. (2) Order of restriction against convicted offender .– In any case i
Provisions explicitly cited in other instruments 5
Section 110 of Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1898 (Under Review)
Cited by RESTRICTION OF HABITUAL OFFENDERS (PUNJAB) ACT, 1918
Read source and target evidence
Explicit source reference
prescribed in the order; or it may do both. 3. Order of restriction against habitual offenders .– (a) In any case in which a Magistrate may under the provisions of section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 3 , as it is at prese nt enacted or as it may from time to time be amended, require a person to show cause why he should not be ordered to execute a bond for his good behaviour, the Magistrate may in lieu of or in addition
Target heading · Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1898 (Under Review)
110. Security for good behaviour from habitual offenders. Whenever a 2[* *], 3[Magistrate of the first class] receives information that any person within the local limits of his jurisdiction— (a) is by habit a robber, housebreaker, 4[*] thief 5[or forger,], or (b) is by habit a receiver of stolen property knowi
Section 118 of Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1898 (Under Review)
Cited by RESTRICTION OF HABITUAL OFFENDERS (PUNJAB) ACT, 1918
A matching operative heading has not been identified.
Read source and target evidence
Explicit source reference
, the Magistrate shall make an order accordingly: Provided that he shall not make an order of restriction against any person against whom he makes an order under section 118 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 3 , requiring such person to execute a bond for his good behaviour. Particulars to be specified in order of restriction .– In his order under this section the Magistrate shall state whether the said person shall be restri
Section 565 of Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1898 (Under Review)
Cited by RESTRICTION OF HABITUAL OFFENDERS (PUNJAB) ACT, 1918
Read source and target evidence
Explicit source reference
(2) Order of restriction against convicted offender .– In any case in which a Court or Magistrate is empow ered to take action against any convicted person under section 565 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 2 , such Court or Magistrate may if it or he thinks fit at the time of passing sentence on such person and in lieu of passing an order under the said s ection make an order of restriction against such person for a period
Target heading · Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1898 (Under Review)
1[565. Order for notifying address of previously convicted offender.__ (1) When any person having been convicted__ (a) by a Court in 2[Pakistan] of an offence punishable under section 215, section 489A, section 489B, section 489C, or section 489D of the Pakistan Penal Code, (XLV of 1860), or of any offence
Section 118 of Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1898 (Under Review)
Cited by RESTRICTION OF HABITUAL OFFENDERS (PUNJAB) ACT, 1918
A matching operative heading has not been identified.
Read source and target evidence
Explicit source reference
. Power to substitute order of restriction for bond for good behaviour .– When an order requiring security for good behaviour h as been made against any person under section 118 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1898 3 by any Court whether before or after this Act comes into force, the District Magistrate may at any 1India Act V of 1898. 2India Act V of 1898. 3India Act V
Section 79(2) of Government of India Act, 1915
Cited by RESTRICTION OF HABITUAL OFFENDERS (PUNJAB) ACT, 1918
The named instrument has not been matched in this library.
The source cites (2). The target link identifies the numbered heading; this subparagraph chain has not been independently matched.
Read source and target evidence
Explicit source reference
ab and requiring habitual offenders in the Punjab to report themselves, and whereas the previous sanction of the Governor -General in Council has been obtained under section 79(2) of the Government of India Act, 1915, to the passing of this Act: it is hereby enacted as follows:– 1. Title and extent .– (a) This Act may be called the Restriction of Habitual Offenders (Punjab) Act, 1918. (b) It extends to the Punjab. 2. Scope of orde
Cited instruments not matched in this library 1
Explore this law in the whole-library map · Download this law’s relationship evidence · Download preserved source record
Original-source comparison
Original-source character comparison matched under the recorded normalization
Open the compared original source
Source comparison checks the identified transcription and edition. The law's current force, later amendments and territorial application require separate legal review.
Comparison evidence
- Stored text SHA-256
- 91139212f9b9d135eb20594130ccdeaeb24d96fc24e9637455dc6586c324b417
- Original source SHA-256
- fff8b010006908a716b49a37260dfd8856d9d839c71d4d8ae717ec9d43ec8002
- Comparison method
- Complete exact non-whitespace character stream after NFKC, quotation-mark equivalents and soft-hyphen removal. Word boundaries and PDF line-layout differences remain separately described.
Source, version and text details
- Recorded title
- RESTRICTION OF HABITUAL OFFENDERS (PUNJAB) ACT, 1918
- Source collection
- Punjab — this does not establish territorial applicability.
- Recorded version
- Not supplied in this record
- Source snapshot
- 2026-08-06T17:02:29Z
- Legal status
- not independently verified
- Text quality
- Complete stored UTF-8 TXT file recovered byte-for-byte from owned Drive. Source transcription retained verbatim; legal completeness, OCR accuracy and current consolidation unverified.
- Recorded quality flags
- No additional flags recorded
- Stable record
- punjab-code-b11cf8664a266cc5
- Content extent
- Legal completeness not independently established
- Integrity scope
- Stored UTF-8 text and TXT download bytes checked against their recorded hash. This does not establish legal authenticity or currency.
- Passage offsets
- zero-based Unicode code points and UTF8 bytes; end exclusive
- Stored text SHA-256
- 91139212f9b9d135eb20594130ccdeaeb24d96fc24e9637455dc6586c324b417